A difficult start to the new year
7 February 2022
It was a difficult start to the new year, with a global, simultaneous selloff in stock and bond markets leaving few asset classes or geographies unscathed. The major reasons for this market turbulence can be traced back to the end of 2021 and the actions of the central banks, who have so often been at the heart of market performance these last few years.
The biggest impact was undoubtedly made by the Federal Reserve, which toughened its messaging in relation to the pace of change of US interest rates and the speed at which it would be reversing its market interventions. With inflation data also very strong, bond markets had ample reason to sell off and as they did so, equity markets too began to wobble
“Smaller companies fell further than larger ones and faddish growth sectors (plus crypto currencies) also dropped sharply around the globe.”
Although there was widespread and sustained selling for most of January, this retreat was characterized more by violent rotations within markets than by across the board selling pressure. Popular growth sectors which are perceived as more likely to be affected in a higher interest rate environment, led the falls within stock markets, whilst less fashionable ‘value’ focussed sectors rallied. Smaller companies fell further than larger ones and faddish growth sectors (plus crypto currencies) also dropped sharply around the globe. In contrast, commodities, especially energy related ones, performed well boosted by the ongoing geopolitical tensions in Ukraine. At the low point, global stock markets had retreated -12% from their recent highs before bargain hunting helped fuel a rally into month end and the early part of February.
As sentiment and investor positioning started to move into risk off territory over January, it was interesting to note that longer run inflation expectations have hardly budged. Although inflationary pressures are at the root of these current price movements, it seems that markets aren’t adjusting their ideas that inflation will eventually end up tamed and manageable. However, in order to reach this end point, interest rates will need to go up faster than previously thought in order to bring the current stubbornly high readings down. January has been a quick and painful readjustment to this new point of view and although we would be hesitant to say the volatility is over, it is fair to say that market expectations are now much better aligned with what is happening in the global economy.
“The January falls in markets thus seem to reflect a ‘’blow off’’ of speculative froth in financial markets that crept in as a result of the enormous support programmes provided during the Covid years.”
Events in most economies have been generally favourable over the month, with Western developed nations gradually emerging from the Omicron wave with renewed vigour. There is also a growing body of market opinion sensing that the Chinese authorities will be increasing stimulus throughout the year to help guard against property sector issues spilling over into the wider economy. With the real (or after inflation) yields of bond markets still firmly negative, the global economy does not seem to be in any great difficulty at the moment, nor in the immediate future. The January falls in markets thus seem to reflect a ‘’blow off’’ of speculative froth in financial markets that crept in as a result of the enormous support programmes provided during the Covid years.
The speed and degree of some price movements also serves as a reminder of how much market structure has also changed across asset classes since the financial crisis of 2008. The majority of daily trading is now ‘rules based’ in some manner, with automatic selling (or buying) of securities after market movements acting to amplify those movements. This can offer up as many opportunities as it does threats – smaller company valuations for example are at multi decade lows after sharp falls, and although we don’t think that volatility is over (the Ukrainian situation being a key near term reason why that is the case) we do think that the outlook is still, on balance, unchanged from our ‘glass half full’ expectations at the end of 2021.
Portfolios overall returned between -2% to -6% on average, with the higher risk mandates falling the most. Unsurprisingly it was equities which bore the brunt of losses with smaller company and growth exposures suffering the most. More value exposed positions held up much better and these performances were reflected across geographies. Commodity positions and alternative strategies performed well, the former due to the strength of energy markets and the latter due to the nature of various option based strategies, which tend to perform well in volatile environments. Although bond markets were weak, positions here were generally resilient, reflecting the fact that most managers are either shorter duration in their exposures or hedged to some extent on interest rate sensitivity, or both.
On behalf of the Saltus Investment Committee, January 2022
Saltus Asset Management is a trading name of Saltus Partners LLP which is authorised and regulated by the financial conduct authority. Information is correct to the best of our understanding as at the date of publication. Nothing within this content is intended as, or can be relied upon, as financial advice. Capital is at risk. You may get back less than you invested.
Arrange a financial review...
Share this article:
We are unconstrained, multi-asset class investors with an award winning track record. The asset management team serves both institutions and individuals. This focus and experience means our UK private clients have access to superior investment solutions that are typically unavailable to retail clients.
Our team of experts will partner with you to tailor a suitable investment mandate with an appropriate risk budget. Our Asset Allocation Committee shapes the core components of our investment portfolios before assigning capital to various asset classes through an allocation to third party managers.
We have a long track record of producing superior risk-adjusted returns for our clients. This is in part due to our ability to consistently identify third-party investment managers who outperform their benchmarks. We do this through a proprietary ‘Five Factor’ model designed to identify investment manager capability.
Environmental, Social and Governance
We believe in responsible investment management, and so assess Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors are assessed prior to making any investment decision. We then continue to work closely with third party managers on an ongoing basis to improve their ESG performance.
Our expert investment management team has an established history of working in partnership with professional intermediaries. We help provide the support your clients may need and understand the requirements of each separate case prior to designing a suitable investment strategy.